• San Antonio: 210-874-2615
  • Nationwide Toll Free: 866-517-5659
  • Austin: 512-520-0221
  • Corpus Christi: 361-254-7873

3M Earplugs

Serving Clients Nationwide From Our Texas Offices in Corpus Christi, San Antonio, and Austin

Thomas J. Henry is representing U.S. service members and veterans nationwide who have developed hearing loss and tinnitus because of defective combat earplugs manufactured by 3M and Aearo Technologies. The defective military earplugs were issued from 2003 to 2015 to troops deployed in Afghanistan, Iraq, Pakistan, Somalia, Libya, and the Indian Ocean and were also used during training.

Read more


U.S. Government Alleges 3M Knew Military Earplugs Were Defective, Falsified Test Results

The 3M earplugs were developed as “selective attenuation earplugs” and consist of two inverted cones connected at the bottom with a stem. This dual-ended design is meant to provide wearers with two different levels of protection: one end works like a traditional earplug while the other end, referred to as the “open” end, allows the wearer to hear quieter sounds like speech while still attenuating loud noises, such as explosions.

However, recently released court documents suggest the stem that connects the two ends of the earplugs is too short and prevents the earplugs from sitting deeply enough in the ear to provide protection. Additionally, the 3M earplugs can “loosen in the wearer’s ear, imperceptibly to the wearer and even trained audiologists visually observing the wearer, thereby permitting damaging sounds to enter the ear canal by traveling around the outside of the earplug.”

To make matters worse, the U.S. Justice Department alleges that 3M and Aearo Technologies, the original manufacturer of the earplugs, knew about the defect as early as 2000 and manipulated test results to make it appear that the devices met government standards. These companies then proceeded to sell the defective earplugs to the U.S. government who then distributed the devices to U.S. troops as standard issue equipment.

In July 2018, 3M Company agreed to pay the U.S. Department of Justice $9.1 million to settle a whistleblower False Claims Act suit accusing the company of knowingly selling defective earplugs to the U.S. military. Unfortunately, service members and veterans who developed tinnitus or hearing loss from using the faulty 3M military earplugs will not receive any of this money. This does not mean, however, that affected military members are left without a method of recovery.

Can I Sue for Tinnitus or Hearing Loss Caused by Defective 3M Earplugs?

If you used 3M Dual-Ended Combat Arms Earplugs while in the military and now suffer from tinnitus or hearing loss, contact Thomas J. Henry immediately. For the past 25 years, our experienced product liability attorneys have handled a multitude of defective product cases and have litigated against some of the largest companies in the world. Our extensive legal and financial resources allow us to provide our clients with truly dynamic legal representation.

Let us help you recover the compensation you are entitled to.


Your Questions Answered

We have straight answers to difficult questions to help you make critical decisions, navigate legal process and help you get justice.

Following an accident, there are always more questions than answers. At Thomas J. Henry, we’re here to answer any questions you have about your injury case.

If you have been injured or suffered illness due to a recalled drug, having an expert witnesses can be essential to proving your claim. Thomas J. Henry has spent decades building professional relationships with leading experts including:

  • Pharmacologists
  • Toxicologists
  • Regulatory Compliance Consultants
  • Forensic toxicologists
  • Drug Injury Causation Experts
  • Biomechanics

Thousands of lawsuits across the country may be filed with a mass tort. These lawsuits are filed in numerous federal district courts. In a mass tort, federal judges will consolidate the thousands of lawsuits into a single proceeding. One judge in a single federal district court will oversee litigation, allowing for consistent rulings and a more expeditious process for the plaintiffs.

A court will consider if a mass tort lawsuit is permissible by determining:

  • whether a large number of plaintiffs are involved
  • whether the plaintiffs are located near or far from each other;
  • whether the injuries sustained are similar among the plaintiffs;
  • whether the claims arose from the same cause (defective toy, car part, oil spill, etc.)

Defective products, such as car parts, toys, or other consumer goods.

Pharmaceutical drugs, such as those that are later linked to severe or fatal health consequences Environmental hazards, such as polluted water sources contaminated by nearby industrial sites or an oil leak.

In a mass tort, each plaintiff (injured person) has an individual claim resulting from their unique damages. In a class action, many plaintiffs are considered collectively. Similarly, in a mass tort, each individual’s claim “value” is unique to the severity of their injuries. In a class action, plaintiffs generally suffer injuries of similar severity, resulting in the same amount of compensation value.

A tort is a civil wrongful act committed by a person or company that results in harm to another person. A mass tort is when multiple victims are injured by the same single tort.

Our Practice Areas

Representing injured victims from across the United States.

No matter the injury or the accident, if you or a loved one were harmed due to the negligence of an individual or company, Thomas J. Henry is here to assist you.

Our Locations

Contact Us for a Free Case Review

info@tjhlaw.com

Contact Form
Loading...
Do you really want to end conversation?
chat-icon Live chat
avatar Waiting